Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

provisioner logic removal, 2nd attempt #4416

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

drahnr
Copy link
Contributor

@drahnr drahnr commented Nov 30, 2021

Attempt to land #4254 again, squashing the remaining 🐛

@drahnr drahnr added A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage. I9-footprint An enhancement to provide a smaller (system load, memory, network or disk) footprint. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. A1-needsburnin labels Nov 30, 2021
@drahnr drahnr self-assigned this Nov 30, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. and removed A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage. labels Nov 30, 2021
@drahnr drahnr marked this pull request as draft December 16, 2021 11:19
@drahnr
Copy link
Contributor Author

drahnr commented Jan 19, 2022

This will remain for the time being.

@drahnr drahnr closed this Jan 19, 2022
@ordian ordian added the T4-parachains_engineering This PR/Issue is related to Parachains performance, stability, maintenance. label Aug 16, 2022
@ordian ordian deleted the bernhard-provisioner-logic-removal branch September 30, 2022 11:56
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. I9-footprint An enhancement to provide a smaller (system load, memory, network or disk) footprint. T4-parachains_engineering This PR/Issue is related to Parachains performance, stability, maintenance.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants